A Technical Review of Modern Cassava Technology Adoption in Nigeria (1985–2013): Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities

No votes yet
Your rating: None


In recent times, results of various adoption studies have been mixed, raising questions regarding why some improved farm technologies are still not widely adopted several years after their first introduction. Many improved cassava varieties have been introduced to millions of farm households across Africa south of the Sahara. Using an extensive review of cassava-adoption literature focused on Nigeria, this paper discusses the uptake of improved cassava varieties. Generic measurement and methodological issues in the literature are illuminated and alternative approaches suggested. The literature can be improved to better inform policy by considering issues such as attribution constraint due to varietal identification challenges and sample selection bias that can limit interpretation of findings. Very few studies disaggregated adoption by men and women, thus the literature can provide more policy relevance by giving adequate attention to gender considerations. Also, the use of only descriptive statistics and dichotomous choice models is most common while issues of sequencing, simultaneity, endogenity, and social learning effects in adoption decisions are under-evaluated. The local germplasm at research institutions in the country is not exhaustive and thus efforts should focus on improving the database for an effective use of a DNA fingerprinting technique in the varietal identification process.
Lessons are also drawn for the effective introduction and dissemination of biofortified provitamin A cassava in Nigeria. Historically, public institutions and international agencies have been the drivers of Nigeria’s cassava sector. A market-based approach focusing on attracting private sector investment would be important to ensuring sustainability in the adoption of provitamin A cassava. Farmers’ fields have always been characterized by a mix of improved cassava varieties and landraces, suggesting that several varieties of provitamin A cassava should be promoted simultaneously in order for a significant replacement of landraces to take place over time on farmers’ fields.

Adewale Oparinde
Tahirou Abdoulaye
Victor Manyong
Ekin Birol
Dorene Asare-Marfo
Peter Kulakow
Paul Ilona
HarvestPlus Working Paper